§677 · July 29, 2009 · Posts · 3 comments ·


is if you scramble through life trying to play the choose your own adventure game, you’re just wasting time. that’s what sucks. cuz choose your own adventure books, there is no time- you don’t lose time really when you can hold the page on your regrets to explore the other choices. that would be really convenient.

in real life, you lose a lot of time scrambling back. and so we just stick with our decision and move on- because it’s too late to turn back. and sometimes that’s what sucks. you’re stuck. and time keeps moving. and we keep trying to do the next thing better and bigger, in a sense, to make up for what we missed. but nothing ever replaces whats missed, it’s too unique. oh wells, there is merit to unrelenting committment. or more realized potential, rather.

 

 

 

§658 · July 28, 2009 · Posts · (No comments) ·


was there a crucial reason why apple decided to continue calling the itouch, ipod touch? because i just noticed nobody calls it the ipod touch except apple. nobody. everyone i know or don’t, refuses to waste time pronouncing two words instead of one. it’s funny to me a company that still insists for you to click one button instead of two, now wants people to say two words instead of one.

i tried looking up “itouch” and only references to the ipod touch came up. there doesn’t seem to be a product of the same name so what’s the issue? did they want to emphasize the fact that it’s a continuation of the ipod line? but it’s so far removed- it plays games, surfs the web, checks email…  there’s an accelerometer in it for crying out loud. playing music is the least of what it can do, it’s closer to the iphone than the ipod.

but logically then, shouldn’t the iphone be called the ipod touch phone?

 

 

 

§656 · July 24, 2009 · Posts · (No comments) ·